Sebastian Sorger vs Twan Van Zijl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sorger vs Zijl analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Sorger vs Twan Van Zijl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sorger 1 - 0 Zijl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sorger has won 48.63% of points on his second serve, while Zijl has won 59.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sorger, in recent form, has won 53.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zijl has won 51.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.86% and 35.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sorger has saved 57.08% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zijl has saved 42.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sorger has won 50.82% of matches played (W/L 31/ 30), with Zijl winning 56.1% (W/L 23/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sorger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 44/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 49/ 41). Zijl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 26/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Sorger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.54% of matches (W/L 31/ 28), where as Zijl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.1% of matches (W/L 23/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sorger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sorger winning 2 and Zijl winning 0. The last match between Sorger and Zijl was at the M15 Limassol, 29-11-2023, First, Hard with Sebastian Sorger getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sorger and Zijl have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sorger winning 0 times and Zijl 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sorger winning 0, and Zijl 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sorger has played against opponents with an average rank of 227.1 while Zijl has played against players with an average rank of 44.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sorger has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zijl has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sorger has converted 41.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zijl has converted 71.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Sebastian Sorger
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
747
Rank
689
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
Twan Van Zijl
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
58% (93-68)
Career Total W/L
55% (36-29)
50% (11-11)
YTD W/L
53% (8-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sebastian Sorger | Twan Van Zijl |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:13:0 | 1:13:0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (27/44) | 71% (41/58) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (17/27) | 39% (16/41) |
2nd Serve Win% | 59% (10/17) | 47% (8/17) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Points W% | 59% (34/58) | 39% (17/44) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-0 |
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Twan Van Zijl
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sebastian Sorger | Twan Van Zijl |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 53% (8/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 49% (25/26) | 49% (17/18) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (235/226) | 51% (183/173) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 64% (7/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 25% (1/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.09 | 0 |
Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.01 |
DFs Total | 29 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:42 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 226.95 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 72% (1049/1453) | 81% (116/143) |
1st Serve W% | 61% (637/1049) | 47% (54/116) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (204/404) | 59% (16/27) |
BPs Won% Total | 40% (81/203) | 71% (5/7) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (699/1586) | 40% (45/113) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 52% (11/10) | 53% (8/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (9/20) | 53% (8/15) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 20% (1/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 80% (4/5) |
1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 100% (6/6) |
1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 0% (6/0) |
1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 22% (9/2) |
Sebastian Sorger Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Duarte Vale
Player
Sebastian Sorger
74%
(
71 of
96)
1st Serve %
87%
(
66 of
76)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Josip Simundza
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
85)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Janos Fekete
81%
(
80 of
99)
1st Serve %
82%
(
76 of
93)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
96
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
SF |
Sander Jong
Player
Sebastian Sorger
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
84%
(
76 of
90)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Lilian Marmousez
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
36%
(
8 of
22)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
23
Total Points Won
17
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Dusan Obradovic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Charlie Camus
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Sorger
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mili Poljicak
Player
Sebastian Sorger
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Matic Kriznik
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Twan Van Zijl Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Maxim Zhukov
Player
Twan Van Zijl
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
61 of
78)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 2-6 10-6 | H2H |
view more